Honorary surrender
“It’s a pity that people do not study the history of military coups,” Israeli military expert David Sharp tells Novaya-Europe. “Otherwise, they’d know that the two opposing sides could quite well come to an agreement during a coup. This has happened quite often in African countries. Although, usually there’s more blood spilled than during Prigozhin’s rebellion. When one of the conflict sides realises the futility of further action, the negotiations begin. In this case, I am certain, we are dealing with an honorary surrender.
It seems that Prigozhin had serious goals at first. However, in the several hours the “march for justice” was occurring, the Wagner chief must have realised that he would not be able to reach the objectives he had set out.
For example, the regular army units did not rush to join the mercenaries. And in Moscow, obviously, they would have had to engage in urban warfare, which could lead to the death of Prigozhin himself.”
According to David Sharp, one has to pay attention to the fact that Prigozhin was seen as an equal and a strong opponent in the negotiations. In the end, he was not officially declared a traitor, insurgent, or rebel that needed to be arrested immediately.